J. R. R. Tolkien is the type specimen for good worldbuilding. He used his expertise in linguistics and medieval poetry to invent new languages, then built a world around those languages, then wrote stories in that world. I have always loved Tolkien and so he should have a place in my discussions of world building. Unfortunately, Middle Earth does not fit the criteria I established in Part I. It does have an atmosphere, but it is not a sphere. The sun and moon are a fruit and a flower from the two trees that sail in ships across the sky. This is not a place where we would expect normal climate science to apply. But the resulting climate ends up mostly making sense. If you understand enough about a few subjects, you often end up inadvertently learning some information about other subjects as well.
Tag: Climate
Climate Science for Fantasy Writers. Part I: A Sphere with an Atmosphere
Fantasy writers often want to make their worlds realistic. Making your world realistic draws readers in more easily and more clearly defines challenges your characters will face and solutions they might use to overcome these challenges. Realism is especially important in historically inspired fantasy because “Popular culture is often how we, collectively, wrestle with these issues [history or organization of other cultures], so it is worthwhile to ask how much truth and meaning there is in it, and what that means for our discourse.” I am not a historian, so I will leave historical advice to other people. But I can help you with climate realism. How can you make the climate of your world more realistic?
Highlights from the Comments on Generating Electricity without Fossil Fuels
My post series on Generating Electricity without Fossil Fuels has gotten some interesting comments. I would like to respond to them here.
Generating Electricity without Fossil Fuels. Part IV: Comparisons and Policy Recommendations
How should we generate electricity?
Last post, we described a simple model of an economy that uses 100 GW of electricity. The economy was assumed to initially be predominantly fossil fuels. We got order of magnitude estimates for various scenarios of how to transition from fossil fuels to either solar / wind or natural gas.
This post directly compares the results from last post. It concludes with my own opinion of which strategy we should pursue.
For this model, I will state numbers for both the 100 GW model economy and numbers for a 500 GW economy – about the size of the US.
Generating Electricity without Fossil Fuels. Part III: A Simple Model
How should we generate electricity?
Last post, we discussed the various power sources from the perspective of the grid and briefly discussed energy storage. This post will put together the results of Parts I & II in a simple model to test different strategies for moving away from using fossil fuels to generate our electricity.
The simplifications in the model will make the transition away from fossil fuels look easier than it is. But they should be a fair comparison between the different strategies we might use.
Generating Electricity without Fossil Fuels. Part II: The Perspective of the Grid
How should we generate electricity?
Last post, we discussed various alternatives to fossil fuels. In this post, we will take the perspective of the grid. How do each of these power sources impact the functioning of the grid?
Generating Electricity without Fossil Fuels. Part I: Overview of Alternative Power Sources
How should we generate electricity?
Currently, the majority of our electricity comes from fossil fuels, especially coal and natural gas. Burning fossil fuels has given us access to tremendous amounts of energy and has made modern civilization possible. Without them, we would have had trouble feeding ourselves, let alone obtaining our current standard of living.
Unfortunately, burning fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases that warm the global climate. And they will run out eventually. What other sources are available?
Book Review of WEATHER, MACROWEATHER, AND THE CLIMATE by Shaun Lovejoy (2019)
Weather, Macroweather, and the Climate is an excellent book on climate science. Lovejoy engages both climate scientists and climate skeptics and attempts to persuade both. It tries to be accessible to a general audience, but I think it ends up being accessible to almost any scientist or engineer. This book is more about climate than about climate change. Lovejoy does not mention climate change until the 6th chapter, out of 7 chapters total. Instead, his main goal is for you to understand the patterns of motion in the atmosphere.